Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-12-26 21:06:16 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5473D6C82753C151E0ACB791F6462C38EBDA168A58DFC735802C34EBCFF3641E
Participant Details

Original Note:

Having previously dismissed eight other claims from Ms. Lake as not constituting grounds for an election challenge, the Judge in this case heard from multiple witnesses before dismissing the two remaining claims. The assertion fraud was “proved”, in any sense, is incorrect. https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/3785655-judge-dismisses-remainder-of-kari-lakes-election-lawsuit-following-two-day-trial/amp/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1607181733924945921
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5473D6C82753C151E0ACB791F6462C38EBDA168A58DFC735802C34EBCFF3641E
  • createdAtMillis - 1672088776313
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16071817339249459215473D6C82753C151E0ACB791F6462C38EBDA168A58DFC735802C34EBCFF3641E