Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-12-24 18:44:21 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 79DA4EE0CEB7C2C6B69A47D91ED0A848D019C7C3F3F3E3EB2E339EF0D7465F67
Participant Details

Original Note:

There is no evidence (https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/browse?text=Mask+Gender+Pronouns#sort=relevance) that a bill has been proposed to have “masks with preferred gender pronouns” be either made available to people and/or required by law.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1606714796652613632
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 79DA4EE0CEB7C2C6B69A47D91ED0A848D019C7C3F3F3E3EB2E339EF0D7465F67
  • createdAtMillis - 1671907461468
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 160671479665261363279DA4EE0CEB7C2C6B69A47D91ED0A848D019C7C3F3F3E3EB2E339EF0D7465F67