Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-12-24 19:18:52 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B07C4E10E746AB5A45278800BD536A6D1021CA1F1D1709CEEF36DE836ECD9704
Participant Details

Original Note:

Scientific American is not a peer-reviewed journal and does not contain information based upon academic research conducted in the scientific community. https://authorscast.com/are-scientific-american-articles-peer-reviewed

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1606713130536636419
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B07C4E10E746AB5A45278800BD536A6D1021CA1F1D1709CEEF36DE836ECD9704
  • createdAtMillis - 1671909532411
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1606713130536636419B07C4E10E746AB5A45278800BD536A6D1021CA1F1D1709CEEF36DE836ECD9704