Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-12-24 19:22:33 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 956713FF41D60DA7186FD79696A1BEA588847A2477E63774D73E11D2F1993A64
Participant Details

Original Note:

Scientific American is not a peer-reviewed journal and does not contain information based upon academic research conducted in the scientific community. https://authorscast.com/are-scientific-american-articles-peer-reviewed

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1606713130536636419
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 956713FF41D60DA7186FD79696A1BEA588847A2477E63774D73E11D2F1993A64
  • createdAtMillis - 1671909753501
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1606713130536636419956713FF41D60DA7186FD79696A1BEA588847A2477E63774D73E11D2F1993A64