Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-12-21 19:14:03 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: CA74D4EF08298D61FE7A8EBD2F1F8B5B4F813EEF8EF9895DD3A0D0FF419DD959
Participant Details

Original Note:

OPINION This is clearly an opinion. It doesn’t need massaging by a reviewing community. Even the two notes here were actually arguing here - both belonged in the comment section IMHO. If anything, notes should improve the information and not just become prioritized comments.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1605519274990247938
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - CA74D4EF08298D61FE7A8EBD2F1F8B5B4F813EEF8EF9895DD3A0D0FF419DD959
  • createdAtMillis - 1671650043653
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1605519274990247938CA74D4EF08298D61FE7A8EBD2F1F8B5B4F813EEF8EF9895DD3A0D0FF419DD959