Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-12-21 17:55:58 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 932A253B39B7B04CD938AE90F68A2BDDE128B3B56B6499D2E14A18E37D53054D
Participant Details

Original Note:

Manuscripts submitted to medRxiv are "NOT" certified by scientific peer review, edited, or typeset before being posted online. Source link "NOT Peer Reviewed" https://www.medrxiv.org/about/FAQ A peer-reviewed publication is considered necessary to ensure academic scientific quality. https://www.usgs.gov/faqs/what-does-it-mean-when-publication-peer-reviewed

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1605418010218487809
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 932A253B39B7B04CD938AE90F68A2BDDE128B3B56B6499D2E14A18E37D53054D
  • createdAtMillis - 1671645358598
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1605418010218487809932A253B39B7B04CD938AE90F68A2BDDE128B3B56B6499D2E14A18E37D53054D