Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-12-18 18:05:52 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A88FABC477690AEB0BC2ACBC4148B92F0AD376E09D3B107C245DDC2E23A2B454
Participant Details

Original Note:

The CA statute is a misdemeanor, and SCOTUS ruled that flight data is not PII in this case: https://scholarship.law.gwu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2076&context=faculty_publications This has to be handled in court against existing precedents or through new statutes but is currently lawful behavior.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1604527936131907585
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A88FABC477690AEB0BC2ACBC4148B92F0AD376E09D3B107C245DDC2E23A2B454
  • createdAtMillis - 1671386752125
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1604527936131907585A88FABC477690AEB0BC2ACBC4148B92F0AD376E09D3B107C245DDC2E23A2B454