Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-12-18 17:54:22 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2C2769A5FB22D1414E6708416DF1C49F6DF521A77D35FE0883AD747944E580A1
Participant Details

Original Note:

The CA statute is a misdemeanor, and SCOTUS ruled that flight data is not PII in this case: https://scholarship.law.gwu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2076&context=faculty_publications This has to be handled in court against existing precedents or through new statutes but is currently lawful behavior.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1604527936131907585
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2C2769A5FB22D1414E6708416DF1C49F6DF521A77D35FE0883AD747944E580A1
  • createdAtMillis - 1671386062810
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16045279361319075852C2769A5FB22D1414E6708416DF1C49F6DF521A77D35FE0883AD747944E580A1