Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-12-19 01:55:38 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 80F7C8C40B6B4A1EF1BC6B157D5E7E44AC7FE1C709C170F0F9C86CD1D6E5BF63
Participant Details

Original Note:

The Supreme Court has already ruled that flight data is not PII. However, technology has evolved, as with most technical evolutions the law has not caught up. This is new grounds for the court. Someone would have to challenge this against existing precedent in: https://scholarship.law.gwu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2076&context=faculty_publications

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1604526101941735424
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 80F7C8C40B6B4A1EF1BC6B157D5E7E44AC7FE1C709C170F0F9C86CD1D6E5BF63
  • createdAtMillis - 1671414938289
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 160452610194173542480F7C8C40B6B4A1EF1BC6B157D5E7E44AC7FE1C709C170F0F9C86CD1D6E5BF63