Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-12-18 17:32:15 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 55C90F8B038626EB47BD2224230323512D2F19F35BEA053ED65A23D629287148
Participant Details

Original Note:

The Supreme Court has already ruled that flight data is not PII. However, technology has evolved, as with most technical evolutions the law has not caught up. This is new grounds for the court. Someone would have to challenge this against existing precedent in: https://scholarship.law.gwu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2076&context=faculty_publications

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1604526101941735424
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 55C90F8B038626EB47BD2224230323512D2F19F35BEA053ED65A23D629287148
  • createdAtMillis - 1671384735536
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 160452610194173542455C90F8B038626EB47BD2224230323512D2F19F35BEA053ED65A23D629287148