Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-12-15 16:18:13 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C87096D87AAA88974F3E5F33BA1084E61CE65FBCC64D7AE7A8A04CCB9A3B48D0
Participant Details

Original Note:

Although the banning of the ElonJet account isn't an unreasonable application of the rules, Musk specifically cited its continued existence as an example of his commitment to free speech. Accusations of hypocrisy are reasonable https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1589414958508691456

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1603064835851386883
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C87096D87AAA88974F3E5F33BA1084E61CE65FBCC64D7AE7A8A04CCB9A3B48D0
  • createdAtMillis - 1671121093752
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1603064835851386883C87096D87AAA88974F3E5F33BA1084E61CE65FBCC64D7AE7A8A04CCB9A3B48D0