Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-12-14 22:11:13 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C740DE02E733BBEA4FEF3BF7631F532E2CFD3DEC38BA9790C01078EC3F946ED4
Participant Details

Original Note:

Although the banning of the ElonJet account isn't an unreasonable application of the rules, Musk specifically cited its continued existence as an example of his commitment to free speech. Accusations of hypocrisy are reasonable https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1589414958508691456

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1603064835851386883
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C740DE02E733BBEA4FEF3BF7631F532E2CFD3DEC38BA9790C01078EC3F946ED4
  • createdAtMillis - 1671055873564
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1603064835851386883C740DE02E733BBEA4FEF3BF7631F532E2CFD3DEC38BA9790C01078EC3F946ED4