Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-12-14 18:07:12 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9F9FA91FB5C32CA4F992EBF4E32A32FADD6FAAC3D5F0F32B1729330EF3555EC3
Participant Details

Original Note:

Although the banning of the ElonJet account isn't an unreasonable application of the rules, Musk specifically cited its continued existence as an example of his commitment to free speech. Accusations of hypocrisy are reasonable https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1589414958508691456

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1603064835851386883
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9F9FA91FB5C32CA4F992EBF4E32A32FADD6FAAC3D5F0F32B1729330EF3555EC3
  • createdAtMillis - 1671041232144
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16030648358513868839F9FA91FB5C32CA4F992EBF4E32A32FADD6FAAC3D5F0F32B1729330EF3555EC3