Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-12-15 02:49:49 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 80F7C8C40B6B4A1EF1BC6B157D5E7E44AC7FE1C709C170F0F9C86CD1D6E5BF63
Participant Details

Original Note:

Although the banning of the ElonJet account isn't an unreasonable application of the rules, Musk specifically cited its continued existence as an example of his commitment to free speech. Accusations of hypocrisy are reasonable https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1589414958508691456

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1603064835851386883
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 80F7C8C40B6B4A1EF1BC6B157D5E7E44AC7FE1C709C170F0F9C86CD1D6E5BF63
  • createdAtMillis - 1671072589319
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 160306483585138688380F7C8C40B6B4A1EF1BC6B157D5E7E44AC7FE1C709C170F0F9C86CD1D6E5BF63