Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-12-14 17:51:35 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0AC13512B529232756CBF57687CEA5B0B4A4C2CD113D2C1CD8B21190BA65B6F5
Participant Details

Original Note:

Although the banning of the ElonJet account isn't an unreasonable application of the rules, Musk specifically cited its continued existence as an example of his commitment to free speech. Accusations of hypocrisy are reasonable https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1589414958508691456

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1603064835851386883
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0AC13512B529232756CBF57687CEA5B0B4A4C2CD113D2C1CD8B21190BA65B6F5
  • createdAtMillis - 1671040295288
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16030648358513868830AC13512B529232756CBF57687CEA5B0B4A4C2CD113D2C1CD8B21190BA65B6F5