Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-12-13 04:48:16 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D9ED441FC4FD5A5EFD32A290B76FEF02CC52C492B4A9BA19F1FE726A50A702FD
Participant Details

Original Note:

Twitter cautioned that the paper has limitations. Third parties made political classifications and as such the results of analysis may vary depending on which source is used. Twitter added that ideology is not a factor their systems consider when recommending content. https://blog.twitter.com/en_us/topics/company/2021/rml-politicalcontent

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1602465404915310592
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D9ED441FC4FD5A5EFD32A290B76FEF02CC52C492B4A9BA19F1FE726A50A702FD
  • createdAtMillis - 1670906896940
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1602465404915310592D9ED441FC4FD5A5EFD32A290B76FEF02CC52C492B4A9BA19F1FE726A50A702FD