Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-12-13 17:10:18 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 33A9FE75F722CDAA2062A02397850EF4ED21C5049FD46309D4F0D7304FD8BF7A
Participant Details

Original Note:

Twitter cautioned that the paper has limitations. Third parties made political classifications and as such the results of analysis may vary depending on which source is used. Twitter added that ideology is not a factor their systems consider when recommending content. https://blog.twitter.com/en_us/topics/company/2021/rml-politicalcontent

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1602465404915310592
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 33A9FE75F722CDAA2062A02397850EF4ED21C5049FD46309D4F0D7304FD8BF7A
  • createdAtMillis - 1670951418051
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 160246540491531059233A9FE75F722CDAA2062A02397850EF4ED21C5049FD46309D4F0D7304FD8BF7A