Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-04-05 01:30:44 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2A3F89EBA8F0E9F2CE5E6566E71D9C6E4E0DF79C856DC0EABFCE4B330CEB49A8
Participant Details

Original Note:

How Anti-LGBTQ+ Rhetoric Fuels Violence: https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/how-anti-lgbtq-rhetoric-fuels-violence

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1602298739900694528
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2A3F89EBA8F0E9F2CE5E6566E71D9C6E4E0DF79C856DC0EABFCE4B330CEB49A8
  • createdAtMillis - 1743816644527
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16022987399006945282A3F89EBA8F0E9F2CE5E6566E71D9C6E4E0DF79C856DC0EABFCE4B330CEB49A8