Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-02 17:56:45 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F262611B3547D3C66BF2C4A807F46C8685D6907B914BDABF61E541A7C9C0C3E3
Participant Details

Original Note:

The tweet doesn’t include enough information for readers to understand the intended meaning or context. It can be interpreted numerous ways: satire, parody, belief that Dr. Fauci should be prosecuted, but again we don’t know the individual’s reasoning.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1602036357165027328
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F262611B3547D3C66BF2C4A807F46C8685D6907B914BDABF61E541A7C9C0C3E3
  • createdAtMillis - 1709402205537
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1602036357165027328F262611B3547D3C66BF2C4A807F46C8685D6907B914BDABF61E541A7C9C0C3E3