Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-12-13 04:02:30 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F2EB1A1D629D662676E34DC4AF3D06C39517D392C2D519C197E1EF50D5E198A6
Participant Details

Original Note:

This has nothing to do with the future of Twitter. The author simply naively fell for a scam.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1602022750021111808
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F2EB1A1D629D662676E34DC4AF3D06C39517D392C2D519C197E1EF50D5E198A6
  • createdAtMillis - 1670904150233
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1602022750021111808F2EB1A1D629D662676E34DC4AF3D06C39517D392C2D519C197E1EF50D5E198A6