Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-12-12 10:43:06 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B706D8843453C6B85BE3DE10484D105E3C2633666DC9EF4BD06B047E49827648
Participant Details

Original Note:

This has nothing to do with the future of Twitter. The author simply naively fell for a scam.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1602022750021111808
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B706D8843453C6B85BE3DE10484D105E3C2633666DC9EF4BD06B047E49827648
  • createdAtMillis - 1670841786411
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1602022750021111808B706D8843453C6B85BE3DE10484D105E3C2633666DC9EF4BD06B047E49827648