Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-12-12 02:13:56 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 41986E5113CEAC0ED14F027847D836685A45602CB202BF71EDF4EBE1B80ABA8B
Participant Details

Original Note:

This has nothing to do with the future of Twitter. The author simply naively fell for a scam.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1602022750021111808
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 41986E5113CEAC0ED14F027847D836685A45602CB202BF71EDF4EBE1B80ABA8B
  • createdAtMillis - 1670811236317
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 160202275002111180841986E5113CEAC0ED14F027847D836685A45602CB202BF71EDF4EBE1B80ABA8B