Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-12-11 12:35:45 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 85F6E11209182A872377A30E20F98E49489C3A22A825E68401B3A8B18984D490
Participant Details

Original Note:

The tweet is misleading readers to believe the reason the bank declined the transaction was because it was a gun. It could have been insufficient funds or the customer had already purchased the daily limit on the debit card. We don't know without further context.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1601877499251634176
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 85F6E11209182A872377A30E20F98E49489C3A22A825E68401B3A8B18984D490
  • createdAtMillis - 1670762145776
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 160187749925163417685F6E11209182A872377A30E20F98E49489C3A22A825E68401B3A8B18984D490