Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-12-11 11:57:10 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6AC4B0555E8E5A0B20D0C4CA78B01D0877C51FFF9D6D6275EA9744C68EDE1515
Participant Details

Original Note:

The tweet is misleading readers to believe the reason the bank declined the transaction was because it was a gun. It could have been insufficient funds or the customer had already purchased the daily limit on the debit card. We don't know without further context.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1601877499251634176
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6AC4B0555E8E5A0B20D0C4CA78B01D0877C51FFF9D6D6275EA9744C68EDE1515
  • createdAtMillis - 1670759830786
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16018774992516341766AC4B0555E8E5A0B20D0C4CA78B01D0877C51FFF9D6D6275EA9744C68EDE1515