Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-12-11 04:51:43 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B7E40C709B8F6DC2D0F02D8EE04AB29A8CA3046B014A877783301288DAF8DED5
Participant Details

Original Note:

The inroduction, "Do I think," designates personal opinion, as does the conclusion that interference is "wrong" - a moral judgement. It could be more clear that "election interference by social media companies" is a personal assessment, not a universal view of the situation. https://www.justice.gov/crt/title-52-voting-and-elections-subtitle-i-and-ii#:~:text=No%20person%2C%20whether%20acting%20under,vote%20for%2C%20or%20not%20to

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1601675528142225409
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B7E40C709B8F6DC2D0F02D8EE04AB29A8CA3046B014A877783301288DAF8DED5
  • createdAtMillis - 1670734303465
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1601675528142225409B7E40C709B8F6DC2D0F02D8EE04AB29A8CA3046B014A877783301288DAF8DED5