Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-12-10 04:37:27 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4C85119B2DB09E5A406C8BECEA123F45A20CDC964CD0E1A1FDFD9FB677A65B32
Participant Details

Original Note:

Zero evidence is provided showing Justice Thomas has been corrupt in his Supreme Court rulings. There is however ample evidence for each ruling he has made showing the opposite to be true. This can be found on a per case basis.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1601344947130712067
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4C85119B2DB09E5A406C8BECEA123F45A20CDC964CD0E1A1FDFD9FB677A65B32
  • createdAtMillis - 1670647047723
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16013449471307120674C85119B2DB09E5A406C8BECEA123F45A20CDC964CD0E1A1FDFD9FB677A65B32