Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-12-10 02:09:56 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 631CBC35E471684942921197AC2989BFA9727C57887236E3D1BDA337253BDFC5
Participant Details

Original Note:

Intellectually dishonest. The special notations were to prevent rage banning by middle management. Upper management knew it was a politically "problematic" account and would require careful consideration on exactly how to censor or ban the account

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1601160497763700736
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 631CBC35E471684942921197AC2989BFA9727C57887236E3D1BDA337253BDFC5
  • createdAtMillis - 1670638196578
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1601160497763700736631CBC35E471684942921197AC2989BFA9727C57887236E3D1BDA337253BDFC5