Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-12-09 14:03:44 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 29A4A997A969F0CF291B0BEF0CC09F453D249DD0A2FAC99C3DD877CFE0A621B8
Participant Details

Original Note:

Intellectually dishonest. The special notations were to prevent rage banning by middle management. Upper management knew it was a politically "problematic" account and would require careful consideration on exactly how to censor or ban the account

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1601160497763700736
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 29A4A997A969F0CF291B0BEF0CC09F453D249DD0A2FAC99C3DD877CFE0A621B8
  • createdAtMillis - 1670594624072
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 160116049776370073629A4A997A969F0CF291B0BEF0CC09F453D249DD0A2FAC99C3DD877CFE0A621B8