Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-12-10 00:15:51 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C8468270FD5B1F2819E50FA2F3E8106CF11A4BB406B7FF273A9905A260B2CCA3
Participant Details

Original Note:

Twitter claimed it did not shadow ban accounts. But certain executives did want to disfavor particular users; therefore, Twitter employees used the spam policy as justification for shadow banning certain accounts. However, these accounts were not actually spamming twitter. https://mobile.twitter.com/bariweiss/status/1601023504916172800

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1601057512626814976
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C8468270FD5B1F2819E50FA2F3E8106CF11A4BB406B7FF273A9905A260B2CCA3
  • createdAtMillis - 1670631351666
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1601057512626814976C8468270FD5B1F2819E50FA2F3E8106CF11A4BB406B7FF273A9905A260B2CCA3