Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-12-09 02:21:07 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0F9F2AE797DF64620DCF116808E336FE7105761DDE99ED4BB9D4D3A61D0F5B7C
Participant Details

Original Note:

It was determined by the previous Twitter administration that tweets Raichik reported did not violate Twitter’s private information policy, as outlined here: https://help.twitter.com/en/rules-and-policies/personal-information Weiss says the content continues to exist. Presumably the new administration agrees that the policy was not violated.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1601032944235282432
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0F9F2AE797DF64620DCF116808E336FE7105761DDE99ED4BB9D4D3A61D0F5B7C
  • createdAtMillis - 1670552467663
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 16010329442352824320F9F2AE797DF64620DCF116808E336FE7105761DDE99ED4BB9D4D3A61D0F5B7C