Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-12-09 01:41:07 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A49F6784F2BF58252EAE90ED6E21DB2E3937F58E6B62E1FF0A338857026707CC
Participant Details

Original Note:

Aside from Twitter already stating that @libsoftiktok didn't violate any policy, all that user does is repost content. If there was something negative, it's because it had already been posted by someone else.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1601027219425476611
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A49F6784F2BF58252EAE90ED6E21DB2E3937F58E6B62E1FF0A338857026707CC
  • createdAtMillis - 1670550067883
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1601027219425476611A49F6784F2BF58252EAE90ED6E21DB2E3937F58E6B62E1FF0A338857026707CC