Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-12-09 02:04:55 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 084E78A621839807C51A47AE793815E2A1997D4F7A060B1C09A05062691B2909
Participant Details

Original Note:

Aside from Twitter already stating that @libsoftiktok didn't violate any policy, all that user does is repost content. If there was something negative, it's because it had already been posted by someone else.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1601027219425476611
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 084E78A621839807C51A47AE793815E2A1997D4F7A060B1C09A05062691B2909
  • createdAtMillis - 1670551495685
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1601027219425476611084E78A621839807C51A47AE793815E2A1997D4F7A060B1C09A05062691B2909