Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-12-09 00:58:23 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0D0CB5A528B55193E34D9FA1CF0F47D84D2BBFA4C77CB480D5EC57EAB373DFD5
Participant Details

Original Note:

The poster cites their substack as a backup of their claim and the only evidence provided therein is an older version of a Washington Post article which may have included an error. https://dossier.substack.com/p/evidence-indicates-biden-admin-prioritized

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1600959400306417675
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0D0CB5A528B55193E34D9FA1CF0F47D84D2BBFA4C77CB480D5EC57EAB373DFD5
  • createdAtMillis - 1670547503225
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16009594003064176750D0CB5A528B55193E34D9FA1CF0F47D84D2BBFA4C77CB480D5EC57EAB373DFD5