Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-09-19 16:45:51 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6E08754836E1A71D4370253811B4B2D78C5FF3D182B29360963EEB2B828DE7FD
Participant Details

Original Note:

As of 12/7/22, the Twitter Files article deletion debate resulted in the article being kept. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Twitter_Files_Investigation Re: ideological bias of Wikipedia, here is Wales response: https://twitter.com/jimmy_wales/status/1600571557004329001 Over time and with many edits, articles trend neutral. They may start biased or remain biased without many edits. https://www.allsides.com/blog/wikipedia-biased, https://hbr.org/2014/12/wikipedia-is-more-biased-than-britannica-but-dont-blame-the-crowd

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1600580302526894080
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6E08754836E1A71D4370253811B4B2D78C5FF3D182B29360963EEB2B828DE7FD
  • createdAtMillis - 1695141951387
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 16005803025268940806E08754836E1A71D4370253811B4B2D78C5FF3D182B29360963EEB2B828DE7FD