Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-12-04 13:24:01 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D9E4C164BF299A744F6DDFCEB38FA66AC228AFD19FFD37C36EFC35B059C5A72E
Participant Details

Original Note:

This is clearly an expression of an opinion. Notes requiring context simply disagree with the opinion being expressed. Given the wealth of opinions about the first instalment of the Twitter Files, readers do not require the context of what this is about.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1599193612364947456
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D9E4C164BF299A744F6DDFCEB38FA66AC228AFD19FFD37C36EFC35B059C5A72E
  • createdAtMillis - 1670160241552
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1599193612364947456D9E4C164BF299A744F6DDFCEB38FA66AC228AFD19FFD37C36EFC35B059C5A72E