Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-12-04 02:09:34 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D6FCED21A523BDF9FFF1AD62D677E2CD9C2D497C0550241E2F3AA539CF79D57D
Participant Details

Original Note:

This is clearly an expression of an opinion. Notes requiring context simply disagree with the opinion being expressed. Given the wealth of opinions about the first instalment of the Twitter Files, readers do not require the context of what this is about.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1599193612364947456
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D6FCED21A523BDF9FFF1AD62D677E2CD9C2D497C0550241E2F3AA539CF79D57D
  • createdAtMillis - 1670119774725
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1599193612364947456D6FCED21A523BDF9FFF1AD62D677E2CD9C2D497C0550241E2F3AA539CF79D57D