Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-12-04 10:18:21 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: BE06BBF9C2FA5FD75F12BB233FFB537D4A0F4A3FCBB2E527B8A4B7FBBDC1D697
Participant Details

Original Note:

This is clearly an expression of an opinion. Notes requiring context simply disagree with the opinion being expressed. Given the wealth of opinions about the first instalment of the Twitter Files, readers do not require the context of what this is about.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1599193612364947456
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - BE06BBF9C2FA5FD75F12BB233FFB537D4A0F4A3FCBB2E527B8A4B7FBBDC1D697
  • createdAtMillis - 1670149101819
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1599193612364947456BE06BBF9C2FA5FD75F12BB233FFB537D4A0F4A3FCBB2E527B8A4B7FBBDC1D697