Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-12-03 15:18:15 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: DCE5C4AB666FFBF3F030BC090A810972ACAD6E65C6A6B35ADEA58945D435ED4E
Participant Details

Original Note:

Twitter users don't have 1st Amendment protection unless the government (Trump admin in 2020) coerced Twitter. However, Twitter voluntarily accepted feedback. It's unclear whether Twitter violated their own TOS by not disclosing that US govt officials had moderating privileges https://www.freedomforum.org/free-expression-on-social-media/#:~:text=The%20First%20Amendment%20protects%20individuals,websites%20as%20they%20see%20fit.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1598889573458841600
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - DCE5C4AB666FFBF3F030BC090A810972ACAD6E65C6A6B35ADEA58945D435ED4E
  • createdAtMillis - 1670080695261
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1598889573458841600DCE5C4AB666FFBF3F030BC090A810972ACAD6E65C6A6B35ADEA58945D435ED4E