Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-01-16 13:09:33 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D752977825D7D32B37B11AECF6CCE2986777E95A506AB09FFB743681D9867CA6
Participant Details

Original Note:

Twitter users don't have 1st Amendment protection unless the government (Trump admin in 2020) coerced Twitter. However, Twitter voluntarily accepted feedback. It's unclear whether Twitter violated their own TOS by not disclosing that US govt officials had moderating privileges https://www.freedomforum.org/free-expression-on-social-media/#:~:text=The%20First%20Amendment%20protects%20individuals,websites%20as%20they%20see%20fit.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1598889573458841600
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D752977825D7D32B37B11AECF6CCE2986777E95A506AB09FFB743681D9867CA6
  • createdAtMillis - 1673874573245
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1598889573458841600D752977825D7D32B37B11AECF6CCE2986777E95A506AB09FFB743681D9867CA6