Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-12-03 13:41:36 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D18A0E40F558AF81739176952EEEDC9A249AAB7A2E778117F5E599C441A2363C
Participant Details

Original Note:

Twitter users don't have 1st Amendment protection unless the government (Trump admin in 2020) coerced Twitter. However, Twitter voluntarily accepted feedback. It's unclear whether Twitter violated their own TOS by not disclosing that US govt officials had moderating privileges https://www.freedomforum.org/free-expression-on-social-media/#:~:text=The%20First%20Amendment%20protects%20individuals,websites%20as%20they%20see%20fit.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1598889573458841600
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D18A0E40F558AF81739176952EEEDC9A249AAB7A2E778117F5E599C441A2363C
  • createdAtMillis - 1670074896831
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1598889573458841600D18A0E40F558AF81739176952EEEDC9A249AAB7A2E778117F5E599C441A2363C