Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-12-03 07:30:31 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1744B5FE596D838AD42FC1E082A50E05E77BEA43B25FF0983488AF6A37E3C6A8
Participant Details

Original Note:

Twitter users don't have 1st Amendment protection unless the government (Trump admin in 2020) coerced Twitter. However, Twitter voluntarily accepted feedback. It's unclear whether Twitter violated their own TOS by not disclosing that US govt officials had moderating privileges https://www.freedomforum.org/free-expression-on-social-media/#:~:text=The%20First%20Amendment%20protects%20individuals,websites%20as%20they%20see%20fit.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1598889573458841600
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1744B5FE596D838AD42FC1E082A50E05E77BEA43B25FF0983488AF6A37E3C6A8
  • createdAtMillis - 1670052631153
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 15988895734588416001744B5FE596D838AD42FC1E082A50E05E77BEA43B25FF0983488AF6A37E3C6A8