Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-12-03 17:40:10 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D8B9D4E2182006BE44D6063B10678275626F4F277E1D124B7146D77A8EF40DE5
Participant Details

Original Note:

As the Supreme Court reiterated in 2019, private parties are not considered "state actors" for purposes of the First Amendment except in "a few limited circumstances." No caselaw suggests requests from a political campaign to a social media site falls within those exceptions. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/18pdf/17-1702_h315.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1598880119099113474
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D8B9D4E2182006BE44D6063B10678275626F4F277E1D124B7146D77A8EF40DE5
  • createdAtMillis - 1670089210690
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1598880119099113474D8B9D4E2182006BE44D6063B10678275626F4F277E1D124B7146D77A8EF40DE5