Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-12-03 06:03:49 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 935AD3D7FCAD2FDCE78D55B5335738AC51CC5F6A43D3C056DBA4F64ADD79C85C
Participant Details

Original Note:

As the Supreme Court reiterated in 2019, private parties are not considered "state actors" for purposes of the First Amendment except in "a few limited circumstances." No caselaw suggests requests from a political campaign to a social media site falls within those exceptions. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/18pdf/17-1702_h315.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1598880119099113474
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 935AD3D7FCAD2FDCE78D55B5335738AC51CC5F6A43D3C056DBA4F64ADD79C85C
  • createdAtMillis - 1670047429695
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1598880119099113474935AD3D7FCAD2FDCE78D55B5335738AC51CC5F6A43D3C056DBA4F64ADD79C85C