Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-12-03 03:54:38 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: DF4B1AFE1CADCF446558A2F73BD586CC85AF4ACE9C5859E0846A216CAED0EF9F
Participant Details

Original Note:

The number sounds impressive, but there is no context to historical data. Additionally, an "impression" is an incomplete idea as it claims to count how many times a tweet was seen, but actually only tracks how many times it was "visible" as a user was scrolling or searching.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1598863777977475073
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - DF4B1AFE1CADCF446558A2F73BD586CC85AF4ACE9C5859E0846A216CAED0EF9F
  • createdAtMillis - 1670039678218
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1598863777977475073DF4B1AFE1CADCF446558A2F73BD586CC85AF4ACE9C5859E0846A216CAED0EF9F