Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-12-03 17:07:01 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4A27520EE411DEC876F4D77139A3E2979FE3D4A46800669FDC69FBFDA5FE79AE
Participant Details

Original Note:

The number sounds impressive, but there is no context to historical data. Additionally, an "impression" is an incomplete idea as it claims to count how many times a tweet was seen, but actually only tracks how many times it was "visible" as a user was scrolling or searching.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1598863777977475073
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4A27520EE411DEC876F4D77139A3E2979FE3D4A46800669FDC69FBFDA5FE79AE
  • createdAtMillis - 1670087221384
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 15988637779774750734A27520EE411DEC876F4D77139A3E2979FE3D4A46800669FDC69FBFDA5FE79AE