Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-12-03 07:29:30 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1744B5FE596D838AD42FC1E082A50E05E77BEA43B25FF0983488AF6A37E3C6A8
Participant Details

Original Note:

Note not needed: Later tweets in this thread reveal that the Trump White House had access to these tools as well. While it’s not a “clear cut” 1 amendment case there is definitely an opportunity to make an argument in a court of law. For these reasons a note is not needed https://twitter.com/mtaibbi/status/1598828932395978752?s=46&t=tYsSvJY5BPg3Hcm7hE4P4A

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1598862055074779136
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1744B5FE596D838AD42FC1E082A50E05E77BEA43B25FF0983488AF6A37E3C6A8
  • createdAtMillis - 1670052570727
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 15988620550747791361744B5FE596D838AD42FC1E082A50E05E77BEA43B25FF0983488AF6A37E3C6A8