Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-12-02 21:43:39 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: FF444746601E455FFA21E41EDE178A2C070D86D4D314B1713BF91DBAA5C41FF2
Participant Details

Original Note:

The user is responding to a NY Times article saying hate speech is up. However, he is doing an apples/oranges comparison. He is using internal data that hate speech tweets that have been reported + taken down have less views. The Times uses total hate speech, reported or not. https://www.nytimes.com/2022/12/02/technology/twitter-hate-speech.html?smtyp=cur&smid=tw-nytimes

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1598776004100689932
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - FF444746601E455FFA21E41EDE178A2C070D86D4D314B1713BF91DBAA5C41FF2
  • createdAtMillis - 1670017419749
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1598776004100689932FF444746601E455FFA21E41EDE178A2C070D86D4D314B1713BF91DBAA5C41FF2