Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-12-01 04:14:58 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E56504D4D4021630DE9879D245F0744F6247A906DF25684074D6DC74B975E51E
Participant Details

Original Note:

The methodology (DW-Nominate) used in this analysis does not measure political philosophy. It documents how politicians vote in relation to their own party, regardless of the substance of the underlying votes. It does not distinguish different points on a political spectrum. https://nationalaffairs.com/publications/detail/the-mismeasurement-of-polarization

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1597815664017743872
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E56504D4D4021630DE9879D245F0744F6247A906DF25684074D6DC74B975E51E
  • createdAtMillis - 1669868098835
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1597815664017743872E56504D4D4021630DE9879D245F0744F6247A906DF25684074D6DC74B975E51E