Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-11-30 16:06:19 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 41F86CD0EA9F6A0798A26452A90B3B70DA8FF4ADFDF3DB59C8A09546A5A5057A
Participant Details

Original Note:

The methodology (DW-Nominate) used in this analysis does not measure political philosophy. It documents how politicians vote in relation to their own party, regardless of the substance of the underlying votes. It does not distinguish different points on a political spectrum. https://nationalaffairs.com/publications/detail/the-mismeasurement-of-polarization

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1597815664017743872
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 41F86CD0EA9F6A0798A26452A90B3B70DA8FF4ADFDF3DB59C8A09546A5A5057A
  • createdAtMillis - 1669824379831
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 159781566401774387241F86CD0EA9F6A0798A26452A90B3B70DA8FF4ADFDF3DB59C8A09546A5A5057A