Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-11-30 00:23:43 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F71958266F2066E9AC1BAA0C702CD024B047B7889026DF0FBA056BB6D5E8CAB5
Participant Details

Original Note:

Chad Loder’s account was recently reinstated, among others who had their original bans reversed. This new ban, specifically for ban evasion, looks suspicious given the context of Loder’s research.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1596870966088450050
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F71958266F2066E9AC1BAA0C702CD024B047B7889026DF0FBA056BB6D5E8CAB5
  • createdAtMillis - 1669767823588
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1596870966088450050F71958266F2066E9AC1BAA0C702CD024B047B7889026DF0FBA056BB6D5E8CAB5